A personal accountability plan sets a commitment, the evidence you will inspect, a check-in, and a repair rule. It should make a missed action visible without turning the plan into a punishment system.

Work through these questions: Two tailored applications

Completed fictional example — SAMPLE DATA

This example shows how to fill in the form. It is not a real person’s record, a diagnosis, a validated assessment or a promised outcome. Use your own observations and appropriate professional advice for actual health concerns.

Question or fieldYour entry
Weekly commitment?Send the venue section before the next meeting
Evidence?A sent draft with facts marked
Check-in?The next planning meeting
Repair rule?Notify the coordinator and agree a smaller repair if delayed
Privacy limit?Share task evidence, not private personal notes

Blank worksheet — copy or print

Copy the form into your own private document or print this page. Replace each “Your entry” cell with your own note; leave anything uncertain clearly marked as unknown. This page does not save or submit your entries.

Question or fieldYour entry
Weekly commitment?Your entry
Evidence?Your entry
Check-in?Your entry
Repair rule?Your entry
Privacy limit?Your entry

Completed example

Question or fieldFictional completed example
Weekly commitment?Two tailored applications
Evidence?Sent confirmations
Check-in?Sunday afternoon
Repair rule?Name the blocker and revise the next step
Privacy limit?Share only agreed details

A worked situation: Two tailored applications

Fictional example. A reader commits to sending two tailored applications each week. A weekly review records sent applications, real blockers, and a revised next step, rather than counting research tabs as submissions.

Separate the commitment from the check-in

Put the work window and the reporting time in different fields. If the commitment changes, preserve the original agreement and record the update rather than editing away the missed promise. Choose what evidence to share and what stays private. The partner or reviewer should know what decision the update is meant to support.

An author model, applied carefully: Look at the Scoreboard

Limits of this specific resource

Related reading