Knowing what to do and doing it are separate records. Check whether the instruction is specific, feasible, and attached to a workable cue before attributing the gap to character.

A worked situation: Update the portfolio

Fictional example. A reader knows she should update her portfolio but has no definition of an update. Selecting one outdated example to replace converts an instruction into a physical action she can schedule.

Work through these questions: Update the portfolio

Question or fieldFictional completed example
Known instruction?Update the portfolio
Specific output?Replace one outdated example
Cue?Saturday morning work window
Dependency?Current project image
Evidence?Published replacement in a private draft

Check whether the instruction is actionable

"I know what to do" may refer to a broad recommendation rather than a defined task. Name the output, the first physical step, and the input it requires. If those are clear, choose a feasible work window. If they are not, the next action is clarification. Kerub’s action lens should make the work specific, not turn an information gap into a character accusation.

A relevant author lens: Systems Versus Goals

The limits of an ordinary example

Related reading