A self-deception worksheet tests a favored explanation against evidence and a fair alternative. Decide in advance what result could make you change your interpretation, so the exercise is not a way to defend it more elegantly.

Work through these questions: The market is indifferent

Completed fictional example — SAMPLE DATA

This example shows how to fill in the form. It is not a real person’s record, a diagnosis, a validated assessment or a promised outcome. Use your own observations and appropriate professional advice for actual health concerns.

Question or fieldYour entry
Favored explanation?The outline needs another layout before review
Supporting observation?I have changed the heading twice
Alternative explanation?I may be avoiding missing factual information
Disconfirming evidence?The coordinator requests only a readable rough outline
Feasible test?Ask what information is actually needed for review

Blank worksheet — copy or print

Copy the form into your own private document or print this page. Replace each “Your entry” cell with your own note; leave anything uncertain clearly marked as unknown. This page does not save or submit your entries.

Question or fieldYour entry
Favored explanation?Your entry
Supporting observation?Your entry
Alternative explanation?Your entry
Disconfirming evidence?Your entry
Feasible test?Your entry

Completed example

Question or fieldFictional completed example
Favored explanation?The market is indifferent
Supporting observation?No replies
Alternative explanation?Old addresses
Disconfirming evidence?Replies from current contacts
Feasible test?Verify and contact one current address

A worked situation: The market is indifferent

Fictional example. A reader says nobody answers her proposals, but three messages were sent to old addresses. Testing current addresses is more informative than declaring the entire market indifferent.

An author model, applied carefully: Look at the Scoreboard

Limits of this specific resource

Related reading